We know you are “wheelie excited” for the e-bike incentive programs funded in the 2023-25 transportation budget to roll out, and we are too! The incentives will provide rebates and lending library/ownership programs so it’s easier for people to try or buy e-bikes. With their boost up that hill and their help for tired legs hauling kids and groceries, e-bikes can replace car trips for many people. An adaptive e-bike or trike can extend mobility for someone with a disability that makes it difficult or impossible to walk very far. At the same time, they dramatically reduce transportation cost per mile along with emissions and pollutants: a win for your pocketbook, a win for clean air and water. They cost a lot less than a car but more than a traditional bike, and that cost can be a barrier. That’s where the rebates come in.
We have a lot of work to do before the rubber meets the road so we don’t yet have a start date. We need to make sure the handlebars, pedals, headlights, batteries, and brakes are all working before we head off on this interesting ride.
What will be included in the e-bike incentive programs?
Washington is joining the first few states to approve statewide e-bike encouragement and incentive programs. In our case we have three models: direct individual rebates and two types of lending library/ownership grants:
- Point-of-sale electric bike rebates: For individual purchasers, with 60% of the vouchers reserved for lower-income households. This program received $5 million in funding, which includes administration and policy research.
- Lending library/ownership programs: For two types of grant recipients to set up lending libraries that can include a bike ownership component. This program received $2 million in funding, which includes administration and policy research.
- Grants to other state entities, local governments, and tribes to make e-bikes available for purposes of employee commute trip reduction;
- Grants to nonprofit organizations or tribal governments that serve persons who are low-income or reside in overburdened communities.
How will the rebates work?
We’ll set up a process for individuals that enables us to confirm residence and income eligibility and a certification process for e-bike retailers. Because we’re still in the research phase we can’t give you a lot of specifics about how either of those will work.
The rebate program will provide vouchers with amounts depending on household income: a rebate of up to $1,200 for someone in a low-income household, up to $300 for someone who doesn’t meet that income eligibility requirement. Vouchers will be applied as a discount when you buy your bike at qualifying bike shops and can also be used on equipment like helmets and locks at the time of purchase. E-bike retailers will be reimbursed for the value of the vouchers they accept.
What’s the income level for the bigger rebate?
The answer is “it depends”. The budget proviso sets the eligibility at 80% of the median household income for the county you live in. This is the same definition of a low-income household that HUD uses.
This table from the state Department of Commerce lists estimated median income by county. In King County, 2022 median household income is estimated at $118,644 so 80% is $94,915. In Pend Oreille County with a median household income of $52,989, 80% comes to $42,391.
When we have a website up for the program, it will include the information you need to know eligibility for your county.
How many rebates will be available?
Our math is approximate since the vouchers are for up to the amounts in statute. We’ve calculated this assuming everyone who gets a voucher uses its maximum value and allowing for administrative and research costs. It comes out to around 2,300 vouchers at the $1,200 level (income-based eligibility) and around 6,200 rebates at the $300 level (no income eligibility requirement) for the 2023-25 budget.
Why aren’t the rebates already available?
Here’s what our team is working on:
- Defining the nitty gritty of how this program will work. A very partial list of topics we need to have clear answers to:
- How can we make the application process as easy as possible for you and your favorite bike shops?
- How do we verify your income and address to know you’re eligible, while providing you with essential privacy rights and data protection?
- How do you know which types of e-bikes are eligible? (Standard e-bike, cargo, family, or adaptive bike or trike, yes. Mountain bike, no—that’s in the law.)
- How do we certify e-bike retailers so we know they have a physical presence in the state and can set up and service your awesome new ride? And how do we process vouchers as quickly as possible so they’re paid for the bike that already left the shop?
- Building in equity. We’ll be setting up an application process with a system that needs to work well for everyone, not just for people with easy access to technology. We also know that the number of people who qualify will far exceed the total we can make available, and we need to plan for that.
- Learning from other programs. Only five states have active incentive programs, three of which are just starting this summer! We’re learning from others about what it takes to run a successful incentive program, and how to adapt it to work best for Washingtonians. This report by the Joint Transportation Committee outlines some of the research on best practices and we’re building on that.
- Talking with e-bike retailers. We’ll be connecting with shops that might accept the rebate vouchers to know what will work best for them so they and the bike buyers are both happy customers of the program.
- Researching options for administration. Sounds boring and wonky, perhaps, but we want to run this program as efficiently as possible. We’re looking into the factors that contribute to the costs of starting up and running it and how we might tap into existing processes for things like verifying income eligibility. We don’t want to recreate the wheel—we want to get you onto your wheels.
What about those lending libraries? I want one in my community!
We want to set these up for success too. The funding for these programs isn’t available under 2024 so they’ll roll out after the rebates. Here’s (some of) what we’ll be figuring out:
- Actual program costs for the grantees. It’s not just buying e-bikes. It’s program staffing, secure storage (at the lending location, and where you’re parking them at home), maintenance, insurance, liability waivers and more. Grant amounts need to be set to make this work for everyone.
- Essential partnerships. Who’s going to maintain those bikes? And make sure the person checking them out can ride away with confidence. The most successful programs incorporate bike education with the check-out.
- Indicators of success. Like the rebate program, the lending library grants will likely have more interested applicants than we can fund. How do we award the funds to meet program goals for equity and environmental justice? How do we and grant recipients define success?
Don’t mark your calendars just yet
In the coming months, we will be working with the University of Washington to define and set up data collection on the effects of this program; their research is one of the requirements in the funding. We’ll continue to connect with many people and groups—existing lending library programs, bike shops, state agency partners, potential grant applicants—to make sure we create the best program possible for you and meet all legislative requirements.
The multiple programs will have different launch dates, and we don’t have a timeline for you just yet. We’ll ring our bike bells loud and clear when we’re ready to roll!
How to get ready for the ride
We know you’re reading media coverage that’s helping generate excitement, like this piece by Washington Bikes and this one by People for Bikes. The best way to know what’s happening is to subscribe to our Walk + Roll E-News to receive updates on all our programs, learning opportunities, and grants, or follow the e-bikes feed tag at the bottom of this post to get notified when we put out another article on the topic. If you want to dive into the research of the many benefits of e-bikes and rebate programs, this list of research will get you rolling.
Thanks to all of YOU for your support in making these programs possible. We can’t wait to see how e-bikes can reduce car trips, emissions, and your transportation expenses; make our communities more bike and pedestrian friendly; and help you all to have an electric-powered whale of a good time while we do it.
KM Hills says
As someone who will not qualify for yet another tax payer funded give away this sounds like a great idea.
I become more and more frustrated living in WA with so many new taxes. The new carbon tax on gasoline, the “state mandated” increased PSE fees that customers can’t be told about. https://www.king5.com/video/news/local/pse-customers-not-told-about-new-rate-hike/281-0dade075-fd5d-4cd2-a414-8b5354459235 and the long term care tax that now comes out of my check.
Help me understand why I should stay after 54 years of living here?
Michael Leones says
Pick winners and losers at taxpayer’s expense. WA state needs a balanced legislative to bring the sanity back. Progressive minds are too generous with other people’s money
Kar says
Name of the Game, or Getting Blood Out of a Turnip?
That’s all they do here, at every level: state, county, local and schools.
There ain’t no funds available?
Create a New Tax to fund the New Fantasy.
I believe that is how they fund all the new construction improvements (demolition/ property destruction) and road maintenance(detours/ traffic congestion).
Wave the Magic Wand and bang the Magic Gavel, it is done again and again; and don’t forget the Gas Tax and Puget Sound b.s they started years ago to “Clean” Puget Sound… just more items to tag onto license tabs renewals.?
Don’t blink.
Brian Borgelt says
This is communism.
A hierarchy that takes from some and redistributes to others as they see fit, while funding an increasingly generous compensation package for themselves into pertetuity.
The more that government “gives away”, the higher the price of everything becomes.
But who in government has any experience in real-world economics these days?
What happened to all the pay-per-use scooters and bicycles that were strewn about the city a couple of years back?
If that had proven viable, they would still be in use, but then when did failure ever stop government from doubling down with tax-payer money?
James Thomas says
Why is communism, a word whose root means common or shared, such a bad word for some?