The Suburban Times

A community bulletin board for Western Pierce County.

  • Home
  • To Know
  • To Do
  • To Ponder
  • Obituaries
  • Calendar
    • Submit an Event
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • More
    • Share your story
    • Submit an Event
    • Contact

Tenancy installment payments one step closer to law

March 9, 2020 By Washington House Democrats

The Washington State Senate voted last Tuesday to pass House Bill 1694 by Rep. Melanie Morgan (D-Parkland), to allow residential tenants to pay initial move-in fees, including deposits, nonrefundable fees, and last month’s rent in monthly installments. The House previously passed the bill in mid-February.

Rep. Morgan worked collaboratively with housing stakeholders and Senators to strengthen protections for both tenants and landlords. The bill was amended to allow landlords to seek reimbursement from the landlord mitigation account when a tenant fails to complete their installment payments. Additionally, holding fees are limited to no more than twenty-five percent of the first month’s rent. Landlords are subject to a fine of one month’s rent if they refuse to allow installment payments. The fine is payable to the tenant.

Because of these efforts, the bill earned a bipartisan vote in the Senate.

The 29th Legislative District that Rep. Morgan represents is in desperate need of affordable housing. HB 1694 will help to reduce barriers that Washingtonians encounter to obtain and maintain affordable housing.

“As a former renter, I know firsthand how hard it can be to come up with many thousands of dollars to put a roof over my children’s heads. These fees can easily reach $5,000,” said Morgan.

In all cases where premises are rented for a specified time that is three months or longer, the tenant may elect to pay in three consecutive and equal monthly installments, beginning at the inception of the tenancy.

In all other cases, the tenant may elect to pay in two consecutive and equal monthly installments, beginning at the inception of the tenancy.

A landlord is not required to permit a tenant to pay in installments, if the total amount of the deposits and nonrefundable fees do not exceed 25 percent of the first full month’s rent and payment of the last month’s rent is not required at the inception of the tenancy.

Morgan continued, “This policy has been working well for tenants and landlords in Tacoma, Burien and Seattle. It is now time to implement this policy statewide.”

This is a priority bill for low-income tenant advocates.

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Comments

  1. John Arbeeny says

    March 10, 2020 at 8:19 am

    Not only does government tax the heck out of your real estate investment, but now they’re your business partners too! Installment payments??? That’s another word for “no security” for landlords. Apparently these politicians have never owned a residential rental. What do you think happens when a tenant moves out of their previous rental? If they’ve been good tenants they get back their ENTIRE security deposit, not in installments but all at once! That security deposit is then applied on the new residence. Put enough pressure on landlords and they’ll sell their investments leaving fewer affordable rentals on the market. What’s next? Rent control?

    The “homeless crisis” has nothing to do with rents. People are homeless due to mental illness, substance abuse and lack of a means of employment….none of which are “solved” by installment payments to landlords. Working well for Tacoma landlords??? Baloney! I am one and I’ve never rented a property to a homeless person: they simply fail the application criteria…like how about having an income?? Or references? Or good credit? Or clean criminal record? This is nothing more than an attempt to distract the public from the homeless crisis which is government caused and supported. Rather than dealing with mental illness, substance abuse and lack of employment which are at the core of the problem, politicians feel the need to do something, anything, to appear as though they “care”. Deal with the real homelessness problems and leave those like landlords who have nothing to do with the problem out of your “solutions”.

    Rep. Morgan apparently can’t do math either. She already has to have the next month’s rent on hand….she would have to even if she didn’t move, so that’s 1/3rd of the problem solved. She would get her security deposit back if she didn’t do any more than “fair wear and tear” to the property she’s leaving. That’s 2/3rds of the “problem” already solved. The last 1/3rd is probably prepaid last month’s rent and typically most landlords don’t charge that up front. Even if they did charge it, at the end of her tenancy she’d have not had to pay the last month’s rent, saved it plus first month rent on hand on the new place plus security deposit returned: 3/3rds and problem solved. This legislation is what happens when politicians don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.

  2. Joseph Boyle says

    March 10, 2020 at 4:21 pm

    John Arbeeny,

    I spent 40+ years as a real estate owner, landlord, and property manager before retiring in an effort to escape government interference with our free enterprise system such as Lakewood’s Rental Safety Inspection program. I was a renter too.

    Now this installment payment plan. Politicians are ignorant when they think a property owner wants to turn the keys to a $100,000 + property over to someone who is not qualified to pay the upfront transition move-in costs.

    Many landlords will never see the installments. If I were willing to accept installments, I would not require the fees in the first place.

    I have a thought. If the installment idea is so wonderful for tenants and landlords alike, why not establish a program where landlord losses caused by deadbeats failing to make the installments are reimbursed from the politician’s retirement fund? If confiscating money from landlords is okay, then confiscating money from politicians makes even more sense.

    As a landlord, I put up a $100,000 plus property and the tenant puts up a measly amount of money in exchange for the privilege of taking possession of my property.

    I took all my rentals off the market which meant they were no longer available for housing the tenant population. A key reason for me refusing to provide rental property is government interference.

    Mr. Arbeeny, your every word and concept is right on target.

    Joseph Boyle

  3. Marie Thompson says

    March 10, 2020 at 6:06 pm

    After my last long-term tenant, I have refused to stay in the rental business. I was successful for over 30 years, enjoyed my business, and had many tenants who stayed years. One less very nice home available. Our society has seriously changed!

    • Daniel W. Dodge says

      March 11, 2020 at 6:12 pm

      Once the landlords sell their properties, there will be no private housing for the tenants. I am selling my rentals. Landlords are being eliminated by the State of Washington. Tenants will be the long term losers.

  4. Daniel W. Dodge says

    March 10, 2020 at 6:49 pm

    The available rental properties are shrinking and the rents will rise because of the shortage. I am selling my rentals. I have had my fill of unreasonable rules and regulations. We have been heading in the wrong direction, and there will be unintended consequences like fewer properties to rent. Good luck to all of the future tenants!

Top Stories

  • Some Pierce County restaurants open dining rooms under new open-air rules
    Some Pierce County restaurants open dining rooms under new open-air rules
  • What's Next, Tahoma Beer? - Name Changes . . . for the good
    What's Next, Tahoma Beer? - Name Changes . . . for the good
  • Lakewood Police Officer Fires Weapon On Duty
    Lakewood Police Officer Fires Weapon On Duty
  • More COVID-19 vaccine eligibility and access points to end the pandemic
    More COVID-19 vaccine eligibility and access points to end the pandemic
  • Mass COVID vaccination sites planned for Pierce County
    Mass COVID vaccination sites planned for Pierce County

Become a better informed citizen.

Join over 30,000 readers each month and get real-local news and information direct to your inbox, Monday-Saturday.


Recent Comments

  • Mona Peterson on What's Next, Tahoma Beer? – Name Changes . . . for the good
  • JAMES H NICHOLS III on Selden Family to receive Larry Saunders Service Award
  • Cynthia Endicott on More COVID-19 vaccine eligibility and access points to end the pandemic
  • Cindy on What's Next, Tahoma Beer? – Name Changes . . . for the good
  • Don Doman on What's Next, Tahoma Beer? – Name Changes . . . for the good

Contact Us

The Suburban Times
P.O. Box 39099
Lakewood, WA 98496

Ben Sclair, Publisher
253-312-1804

Stephen Neufeld, Marketing Executive
stephen@thesubtimes.com

Copyright © 2021 The Suburban Times • Log in • Privacy Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.