Submitted by Don Doman.
Dachau concentration camp was first built in Nazi Germany to hold political prisoners. A political prisoner is someone who disagrees with the current regime. In Nazi Germany that meant Adolf Hitler and his cronies. He sought total control. He padded the courts with fellow Nazis. Nazis were a combination of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and other far-right groups. Hitler demanded unquestioned loyalty. That he lied to his people, his enemies, and the world didn’t matter. He threatened his neighbors and lied to them, too . . . just another day at work.
Dachau concentration camp was first built in Nazi Germany to hold political prisoners. – Attribution: Bundesarchiv, Bild 152-21-06 / Friedrich Franz Bauer / CC-BY-SA 3.0Hitler was a master at naming bad things with good titles and slogans like “Arbeit macht frei,” which is a German phrase meaning “work sets you free”. That slogan appeared at the entrance of Auschwitz and other Nazi concentration camps. Between 1933, when Hitler was elected and 1945 when Hitler was defeated there were 23 main Nazi concentration camps as well a other subcamps for a total of 900 people prisons including camps called “care facilities for foreign children.”
Hitler was a master at naming bad things with good titles and slogans like “Arbeit macht frei,” which is a German phrase meaning “work sets you free”.Families were separated from each other. Hitler didn’t care if people starved or died. The daily food ration in 1943 was one loaf of bread per four prisoners. Prisoners were tortured for no reason or killed for any infraction. Priests were housed separately, but their food ration was one loaf of bread for every three prisoners. This was not out of kindness. This was done so average prisoners would hate the priests. Social unrest is always a tool used by the unscrupulous.
I recently watched The Ninth Day, a 2004 German historical film. The story is based in part on the life of Father Jean Bernard (1907–1994). The book was printed as Priestblock 25487: A Memoir of Dachau (ISBN 978-0972598170). The movie is available on Netflix. In the film a Catholic priest is released from Dachau for nine days. He is sent to stay with his family in Luxembourg. The Nazis want him to pressure his bishop in Luxemburg to cooperate with the Nazis. He needs to persuade the bishop or he must create a statement that might convince other priests to cooperate. If he does that then he would not have to return to the concentration camp. Another option would be to run away to seek asylum in another country, which would endanger his family. Or to return to Dachau to face the horrors of starvation, torture, and possible death. What would you do? Would you have the courage to do the right thing? The priest is a man of principle. He submits a blank page to the SS Officers and returns to Dachau. Dachau was liberated by the United States Army on April 29, 1945.
Someone with a set of moral principles faithfully follows those instead of abandoning them in times of inconvenience. We build our life of principles by the books we read, our religions, the films and TV shows we see, and the people we spend time with an look up to. I remember as a young boy seeing the Davy Crockett episodes presented by Walt Disney. Davy said, “Be sure you’re right then go ahead.” In the movie Hondo, the character played by John Wayne says, “A man oughta do what he thinks is best.” Later I read Ayn Rand and loved her philosophy, “A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others.”
Someone with a set of moral principles faithfully follows those instead of abandoning them in times of inconvenience.In a 1971 interview with Playboy magazine, John Wayne said, “I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.” My temporary heroes have turned out to be bad examples of people with principles. Davy Crockett and the Alamo has lost its charm because I now know that the epic battle was waged by people who wanted to steal the country from Mexico after they had signed papers and accepted free land and became Mexican citizens. The battle of the Alamo was fought in part to defend slavery. Walt Disney refused to hire women animators and happily appeared before the House Committee on Un-American Activities and denounced as communists members of the Screen Actors Guild as well as his own animators whom he had grossly underpaid. Ayn Rand was just plain wrong. She and her characters lacked gratitude and empathy. Although these people had principles, they just fell short of ideal.
A personal example of a principled man probably should have been President Harry S Truman, who said “I don’t pass the buck, nor do I alibi out of any decision I make.” I liked his ideals, “We do not believe that men exist merely to strengthen the state or to be cogs in the economic machine. We do believe that governments are created to serve the people and that economic systems exist to minister to their wants.”
A personal example of a principled man probably should have been President Harry S Truman, who said “I don’t pass the buck, nor do I alibi out of any decision I make.”I was a Cub Scout, a Jaycee, and a Rotarian . . . each one had a code of ethics and a pledge. I do the best I can, but sometimes I fail . . . actually, I often fail. Return on my own to Dachau? I don’t think I could live with myself if I put my family at risk, but I would sure look for loop holes and alternative solutions. The priest simply returned to the camp. He had to. His principles wouldn’t allow any other pathway.
Phillip Schearer says
I never met Ayn Rand, but I’ve met several people who knew her, and based on that I conclude it is blatantly wrong to claim, “She and her characters lacked gratitude and empathy.” In her philosophy, justice ranks as a high virtue, and justice requires “gratitude and empathy” when they are deserved. As an Objectivist for over 50 years, it is because of justice that I am moved to write this.
Don Doman says
Phillip,
Thank you for reading my article and for writing. Well, I’ve certainly been wrong before . . . and will undoubtedly be wrong again, but I hate to think that I am blatantly wrong. What bothers me in your statement is “gratitude and empathy when they are deserved.” It just seems so judgmental. Do gratitude and empathy have to be earned? Does justice also have to be earned? I don’t think so. Gratitude, empathy, and justice should be a daily part of our lives. I like what Albert Einstein said, “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.” But, Albert and I could be mistaken. But then so could Ayn Rand, “Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark in the hopeless swamps of the not-quite, the not-yet, and the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish in lonely frustration for the life you deserved and have never been able to reach.”
Thanks, again for reading and commenting.
Don
Don Anderson says
Don: Your article brought to mind the two occasions I had to help host and have in depth discussions with a very principled man, South African Supreme Court Justice Richard Goldstone, prior to the demise of apartheid. The Readers Digest description of his character is that he was the author of several influential decisions that hastened apartheid’s collapse. One engaging topic of discussion was how to best transition to majority rule when the majority had been barred from access to education. My two subsequent visits to South Africa lead me to believe the best, though not perfect, solution was Nelson Mandela’s efforts at reconciliation. Another man of principle.
Don Doman says
Don,
Thanks for reading AND for writing.
Principles . . . many have them . . . some of them good and some of them bad. You might enjoy the feature film ‘The Forgiven’ with Forest Whitaker as Archbishop Desmond Tutu. I didn’t see how Whitaker could pull it off, but he did. As you point out apartheid had a number of people with principles. I’d like to hear more about your trips to South Africa.
Thanks, again for reading and for commenting.
Don